There are PET journal rows from the old PAYROLL_DETAIL_CU record in 8.4 that were not converted to the new CU_HR_ACCTG_LN table in 9.2. I have identified the issue and have been able to load the rows identified in the example provided by Carl in FINDEV. I am currently testing out loading all the missing rows. Once this is complete and has been verified, we will need to migrate this SQL forward and run it in FINPRD. As Carl stated above, the FOPPS data is correct because the HR_ACCTG_LINE table was loaded correctly at conversion. The employee level detail is stored on the CU_HR_ACCTG_LN table and that is where the issue is. Please let me know if there are any questions.
There are PET journal rows from the old PAYROLL_DETAIL_CU record in 8.4 that were not converted to the new CU_HR_ACCTG_LN table in 9.2. I have identified the issue and have been able to load the rows identified in the example provided by Carl in FINDEV. I am currently testing out loading all the missing rows. Once this is complete and has been verified, we will need to migrate this SQL forward and run it in FINPRD. As Carl stated above, the FOPPS data is correct because the HR_ACCTG_LINE table was loaded correctly at conversion. The employee level detail is stored on the CU_HR_ACCTG_LN table and that is where the issue is. Please let me know if there are any questions.